Euthanasia and end of life issues Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Euthanasia and devastation of life issues - analyze ExampleEuthanasia, the practice of ending life, is one of the issues that involve good dilemmas. This paper explores ethical theories to mercy killing and end of life. Ethics defines a societys morality in terms of what is approved to be total and what is approved to be bad. Acts, either of omission or of commission, are because ethical when they meet a societys approved behavior and unethical when they are contradictory. Such is the basis of the issue of euthanasia that faces conflicting opinions from different ethical perspectives and affected parties. A person in great pain without consent for improvements and is waiting to die, may for example desire assistance to facilitate his or her death while much(prenominal) an act may not be acceptable to care personnel or the patient roles close relatives. Legal professions that supplement professional ethics and patients rights also play a significant role. These factors therefo re induces dilemma on care ethics approach that provides for a positive relationship between caregivers and patients (Bube n.p.). slice both parties are supposed to derive utility from the relationship between patients and care personnel, conflicting bet between the parties over application of euthanasia calls for application of other ethical principles. A consideration of deuce-ace party interest, such as those of relatives and legal provisions, intensifies the dilemma over whose interest should be supreme. Ethical theories of teleology, deontology, and sexual morality ethics yet offer guidelines to determining morality of euthanasia and end of life issues (Bube n.p.). The general teleological approach to ethics involves evaluation of consequences of an action on the society in terms of benefits and handicaps that are accrue from an act. Acts that lead to net benefits, more benefits than harm, are therefore considered ethical while acts that yield net harm to the largest sect ion of the society are considered unethical. Utilitarian ethics has a dual approach to euthanasia and help deaths with some interpretations identifying lack of ethics in the practice while others argue that the act is ethical. Among opinions that argue for utile ethics are three benefits of ending lives of terminal patients who are going through pain as they await their death. One of the beneficial consequences of euthanasia is its recognition of a patients autonomy in decisions about his or her last days. This is because prolonging a persons life against his or her desire br distributivelyes the ethical principle of autonomy and may not yield utility to the suffering patient. It therefore allows patients to decide what willing benefit them more. The practice also has the benefits of eliminating suffering, in a patient and among relatives, in cases where such sufferings cannot be managed and the patient condition deteriorates towards death. Euthanasia also comforts patients with the hope that it permanently relieves them of their pain (Bube n.p.). Utilitarian opinions against euthanasia however argue that a patient may make decision to use the process but nether duress from either care providers or family and the process would therefore not benefit the patient. A utile approach to euthanasia should therefore consider each isolated case to determine possible benefits and harms to each stakeholder, especially the patient (Bube n.p.). Deontological perspective of euthanasia however involves consideration of established moral rules in practice. In euthanasia, for example, deontological ethics correspond to established ethical codes of conduct in the care profession. The fundamental that guides deontological ethics in euthanasia is protecting patient autonomy. The patient must however be terminally ill, is informed of the